Batman Fusion Redemption
Posted: 10 September 2012 01:45 PM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  58
Joined  2011-10-11

The Dark Knight Rises (TDKR) trashes fusion’s reputation.  This post discusses how it can make amends.  But is it accurate? 

Take a look at the discussion of Fusion:  http://www.fusionenergyleague.org/index.php/blog/article/batman_fusion_redemption#flub and the discussion of fission http://www.fusionenergyleague.org/index.php/blog/article/batman_fusion_redemption#play

Where I say,

“The industry settled on the Light Water Reactor precisely because it produces weapons-grade waste (plutonium). What most people are unaware of is that there are many nuclear reactor alternatives with far better energy and safety possibilities that were not developed precisely because they wouldn’t produce weapons-grade plutonium. “

Over on LinkedIn, I get the feedback that:

This is fusion-promotional fiction every bit as egregious as any of the pseudo-physics in the Batman movie. Once the Manhattan Project was done, the existence of that infrastructure (like the Oak Ridge gaseous diffusion enrichment facility, for one example among many) made the incremental cost of fueling a new nuclear fission electric power industry profoundly far cheaper than any other totally undeveloped fission fuel cycle option.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 September 2012 05:13 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  1
Joined  2012-05-14

Rezwan, when you say

“The industry settled on the Light Water Reactor precisely because it produces weapons-grade waste (plutonium). What most people are unaware of is that there are many nuclear reactor alternatives with far better energy and safety possibilities that were not developed precisely because they wouldn’t produce weapons-grade plutonium. “

are you referring to the LFTR at http://www.energyfromthorium.com?


I would like more info on the following quote, but the link you gave cannot be accessed without logging in to LinkedIn. Should we all get LinkedIn accounts?

This is fusion-promotional fiction every bit as egregious as any of the pseudo-physics in the Batman movie. Once the Manhattan Project was done, the existence of that infrastructure (like the Oak Ridge gaseous diffusion enrichment facility, for one example among many) made the incremental cost of fueling a new nuclear fission electric power industry profoundly far cheaper than any other totally undeveloped fission fuel cycle option.

What “fusion-promotional fiction” is that?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2012 02:31 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  58
Joined  2011-10-11
BSFusion - 10 September 2012 05:13 PM

Rezwan, when you say

“The industry settled on the Light Water Reactor precisely because it produces weapons-grade waste (plutonium). What most people are unaware of is that there are many nuclear reactor alternatives with far better energy and safety possibilities that were not developed precisely because they wouldn’t produce weapons-grade plutonium. “

are you referring to the LFTR at http://www.energyfromthorium.com?

Perhaps.  The use of the word “precisely” was overstated.  It’s my impression from reading the Kachan report and the Bloomberg report that this is generally what happened.  Those reports are linked to on the right sidebar of the Bill Gates article.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 09 November 2012 02:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  58
Joined  2011-10-11
BSFusion - 10 September 2012 05:13 PM

I would like more info on the following quote, but the link you gave cannot be accessed without logging in to LinkedIn. Should we all get LinkedIn accounts?

This is fusion-promotional fiction every bit as egregious as any of the pseudo-physics in the Batman movie. Once the Manhattan Project was done, the existence of that infrastructure (like the Oak Ridge gaseous diffusion enrichment facility, for one example among many) made the incremental cost of fueling a new nuclear fission electric power industry profoundly far cheaper than any other totally undeveloped fission fuel cycle option.

What “fusion-promotional fiction” is that?

For that string, yes, you would have to join LinkedIn.  This is the problem with social media.  All this fragmentation, multiple streams of the same conversations, dispersing.  Very unorganized.  It’s a good chat group, so I recommend joining it.

Now to get more of the conversation to take place here : )

Profile