Order of Operations

chat
Posted by Rezwan Razani on Feb 12, 2014 at 06:53 PM
What do you think about this? Let us know in the comments below!

What energy do you vote off Earth Island first?

I watched Pandora’s Promise again at the Princeton Environmental Film Festival. During the Q&A, director Robert Stone pointed out that Germany purports to be green, with its emphasis on solar and wind and other renewables. However, by choosing to shut down nuclear BEFORE coal, it loses credibility.

This observation struck a chord.

The Present Path

At present, Germany is expanding its coal use.  And not just any coal - lignite, the dirtiest kind, as the BBC Reports

Renewable energy requires backup power, and Germany is choosing to avoid nuclear energy, which leaves coal and oil as the backup.  This decision is hard to fathom.  Nuclear energy is thousands of times cleaner and safer than coal

The order of operations that Germany is presently following is:

  1. Shut down Nuclear power
  2. Increase Renewables
  3. Increase use of coal to back up renewables
  4. Suffer thousands of excess deaths from burning coal
  5. Suffer dirty air from burning that coal
  6. Suffer high energy prices, economic troubles
  7. Suffer wind NIMBY backlash

A Quicker, Safer Path

Now, imagine a different order of operations to help Germany achieve its clean energy goals more quickly:

  1. Re-open Nuclear power
  2. Keep increasing Renewables (no change in this part of plan)
  3. Systematically phase out coal and replace with nuclear and renewables
  4. Eliminate thousands of excess deaths from burning coal
  5. Eliminate dirty air from coal
  6. Have more stable energy prices that help with economic planning
  7. Deal with a combination of nuclear and wind NIMBY - but keep in mind, you only need a few nuclear power plants that affect a far smaller area (pdf), so the NIMBY coefficient will be less

And then, AFTER you’ve phased out the coal and all those deaths and dirty air - feel free to replace nuclear with renewables. 

Perhaps by then, energy storage solutions will be available so that renewables don’t require backup power.  And perhaps by then, Germans will have overcome their nuclear prejudice and be filled with pride in the optimal, regionally appropriate mix of renewables and nuclear that emerges. 

Now that’s an environmentally appealing strategy. With no time to lose: Clean air is at stake.  Lives are at stake.

Still afraid? What’s the worst that could happen?  Nature is on your side - just ask the wolves of Chernobyl.  And contemplate the motivations of proliferation fearmongers.

Germany, check your environmental priorities.  Fair enough, you want to get rid of nuclear, oil and coal, and replace everything with solar, wind and efficiency. Just consider your order of operations.

Comments chat

comments powered by Disqus

Category

footprint

Donating = ♥♥♥


The Fusion Energy League is ad-free and has taken thousands of hours to research and write, and thousands of dollars to sustain. Much more remains to be done. If you find any joy and value in it, please consider becoming a Member and supporting with a recurring monthly donation of your choosing, between a fast food lunch and a splendid dinner:


You can also become a one-time patron with a single donation in any amount:


www.FusionEnergyLeague.org - 06/17/19